Should Society Re-examine Monogamy?

Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried.” ~ Winston Churchill

You can rephrase the famous quote above, replacing ‘democracy’ with monogamy and ‘government’ with either marriage or something at once more precise and arcane, like psycho-sexual completion.

I write this as a happily married monogamous man who’s only been with a single woman, my precious Alchemist, and she with me. I’m not fantasizing about illicit pleasures, chafing at my vows, or any such other thing. So, if you chose to comment, leave your ad hominem at home.

Human beings are born incomplete. Evolutionary psychology would teach us that this owes to our primate heritage. Judeo-Christianity would point to the completionism inherent in the Adam-Eve myth. A thing may be both true and not true.

In my own experience, life without my wife would be a barren wasteland that no possible material success could replace. While it wasn’t quite love-at-first-sight, it was obvious to us and those around us that we clicked at a very deep level. Our romance was one that grew out of friendship and I’ve gotten frequent comments from men and women both that envy how deeply we connect compared to their own significant others. As the central love interests of Jacqueline Carey’s Imriel Trilogy continually ask each other, “why is it that we fit together so well?”

All of this would suggest that I’d be a staunch defender of the traditional “definition of marriage” but I’m not. Just as the traditionalists themselves leave open that celibacy or divine intimacy is a valid form of human completion, I’ve seen incredibly strong homosexual unions wherein the individual atoms truly join into a greater whole. Gay marriage is something that, I hope, is merely inevitable in the West but the persecution of homosexuals in vast parts of the world is a worrying human rights situation.

None of this yet provokes a re-examination of monogamy. Marriage, whether traditional or revised, is a one-to-one contract. This one-to-one relationship certainly seems the best, most stable extant form of human union. Polygamy where it still exists is grossly unequal in its implementation. When I discovered the essay Why We F*ck it really got me thinking. Why is sexual expression such a powerful human drive, even outside the bounds of selfish genes and procreation? Is monogamy the best structure or container for that expression?

Read the essay, even if you ‘know’ you won’t agree with it.

Sociology and evolutionary psychology are powerful tools in examining our societal norms, but they inherently limit us to the past and present. What if the ideal human completion is something we haven’t yet tried? This is where speculative fiction becomes a powerful tool.

Monogamy is stable, but inefficient. Pooling resources among two people is more efficient than one. Sexually intimate relationships surely cap out lower than Dunbar’s number but Robert Heinlein’s classic The Moon is a Harsh Mistress paints a society where all kinds of equitable polygamic marriages plausibly work. Anthropology and evolutionary psychology suggest that hunter-gatherer societies were close to this existence, albeit without a codified legal framework.

Sex is sacred. There is a gross difference between a sexualized society and a society wherein sex is revered. It’s easy to deride modern Western society as sexualized. Mores have clearly changed, but the core values have not changed in centuries. Sex is taboo. Hidden. Sex is caught in the bifurcation of pleasure and procreation. The exposure of flesh has risen dramatically in the past 50 years, but what has really changed? Pornography has been normalized, but the titillation of the medium requires treating sex as both hidden and taboo. Otherwise, why should voyeurism arouse?

Consider the world of Terre d’Ange created by the author Jacqueline Carey. Starting with the novel Kushiel’s Dart, she paints a world where prostitution is among the core practices of their religion. That sounds horrible (to modern ears) but the characters who inhabit the world see sex as the key to bringing people together, a form of worship in and of itself, and something which should be neither hidden nor taboo. Sex isn’t something people hide or feel afraid to talk about. It is approached with eyes wide open, whether in monogamous marriages or far more adventurous couplings. Always it is a choice of all parties, and never to be abused.

But sex can bring disease and ‘unwanted’ pregnancy. STDs, like disease in general, are an unfortunate part of the human condition. Yes, monogamy provides insurance against infection, but we also have sufficient technology that safety is guaranteed. Provided sex is entered into with eyes wide open, with total and complete honesty. If sex is a hidden, shameful act, it’s psychologically easy to hide things like dysfunction and disease. In the chapter titled “The First Stone” of The Wise Man’s Fear, the hero has what I would consider an ‘eyes wide open’ conversation about STDs. He asks one of the Adem how they can have such a permissive attitude towards casual sex, since wider society is full of the risk of disease. She responds that bringing disease into the village simply wouldn’t be done. The person would become anathema.

Pregnancy is turn is dismissed by the culture’s matriarchal nature. Men simply don’t have a place in child-rearing. In doing research for this essay, I discovered that this particular passage has been decried by feminists along the lines of “wow, men get it easy. They can f*ck all they want and the women get to clean up.” I don’t think that’s the interpretation worth taking out of it. As a man heavily involved in the upbringing of his children, obviously I’m not interested in shirking any responsibility. What caught my eye is the respect for the other in never hiding disease, and the acceptance that sex requires a calm acceptance of the possibility of parenthood. Modern birth control eliminates a lot of the risk, but even a several percent chance is quite real.

Sex is sacred, but so is life. A child should never be unwanted, regardless of the accidence of its conception. Keep in mind that arguing monogamy should be re-evaluated is not an argument for casual sex with no regard for the other. Monogamy works because it’s stable. Any replacement, for any set of individuals, should be equal or greater in stability. YOLO dalliances that kick consequences down the road aren’t exactly what I have in mind.

I’ve got quite a few years before I need to teach my children about sex. Writing things out like this is my way of preliminarily drafting thoughts, teasing out the structure of my personal values. Regardless of the final structure, what I am convinced of is that truth lies outside of the simple plane between the extremes of ‘traditional’ marriage and, for lack of a better term, pornographized society.

What are your thoughts?

Half-Century Quest Update #2

Big change since the last update. Instead of my 14 year-old Schwinn Mesa MTB, I’m now riding a Trek 7500 FX. It’s a really nice bike that I picked up off craigslist for $250 ($280 if you count the mileage it took to grab it).

The very first ride on it, it felt so good that I add about 5 extra miles to my 25 mile loop. A second 30 mile ride wasn’t as idyllic but it’s a huge improvement over the Schwinn in comfort and speed. Thinner tires have lower rolling resistance, gearing is just as low for hill climbs, but it’s got considerably taller gearing on the high side, promising very fast rides once my legs get stronger/more seasoned.

That said, I think I’m going to experiment with a different training program. Instead of two (maybe three) long rides at night, I want to have more time with the goblins and the Alchemist, so I am thinking of doing shorter rides very early in the morning before the Alchemist leaves for work. I used to be one of those 5AM gym rats, so I know it’s doable, but I’ve gotten in the habit of sleeping until close to 7AM most mornings, so this will take some adjustment.

This could mean the end of my quest, but we’ll see. I’d rather trade rides every day for extra family time 🙂

My flabby willpower

Willpower is a muscle. It’s only as strong as how often you exercise it.

When it comes to personal fitness, my internal motivation has been strong and remains so. My main limitation is the competing desire to spend time with the Alchemist and our lovely litter of goblins. Our frugality muscles are also quite buff after discovering Mr. Money Mustache, and if you haven’t already, read his article on frugality as a muscle.

Diet, the other cornerstone of health and well-being, is my weak point. I best resist food temptations by not being things in the first place, but there’s been an awful lot of questionably nutritious items in the house from care packages and whatnot during the holidays. I suck at resisting sweets, even though I know they’ll make me feel like garbage. For whatever reason, I resist stuff at work really well, but not so much at home.

My cravings for alcohol have similarly been torpedoing my water only personal challenge this month. My consumption of caffeine is zero, which is a huge plus. Even the gentler teas were giving me comedown headaches as bad as my morning coffee used to before I gave it up. Alcohol consumption is down considerably, but it’s not the zero I want it to be. At the end of January, I’ll let you know whether I got my act together or not. I will certainly try.

I know my food/drink willpower muscle is very flabby. I can resist for hours, maybe a few days when I’m really good, but when my stamina gives out, I collapse like an ill-conditioned marathoner in 110F heat. Habits aren’t built in a day, but I really want to build these habits. Public shame seems to work on me, so expect to see a few more of these posts as I continue to work on aspects of my life that need to change.

If you joined in on the water-only challenge, how are YOU doing?

Personal Challenge January 2014: Drink Only Water

I didn’t do a “2014 Resolutions” post, but I do have two overarching goals:

  • Ride 50 Miles
  • Get Thirteenth Orbit ready to submit

Alongside those I want to do some smaller, focused challenges. I don’t know if this will be every month or sprinkled throughout the year, but it’s a way to motivate myself to try and develop some new habits.

This month my goal is to drink only water for the entire month, starting today. I’ve been drinking too much alcohol, and while tea and the occasional sparkling juice concoction aren’t bad for me, I think this will be a nice chance to work on my personal Stoicism. Roman Stoicism in particular is about being able to derive satisfaction from very simple things, like fresh water, bread, rice, etc. So this is both a personal health as well as a mental well-being exercise.

Comment below if you’re interested in joining in! At the end of the month, I’ll let you know how I do 🙂